Michael Savage - Homosexuals are Responsible for Islamic Terrorism!

A while ago I was feeling unformed so I thought I'd listen to the most breathtakingly intelligent thing that anybody can listen to - Right wing talk radio. In case you can't tell, I'm being sarcastic. I was listening to Michael Savage for amusement because he's such a complete idiot.
I am fascinated by Savage because I'm flabbergasted by just how insane he is. He constantly makes totally unabashedly bigoted comments against Muslims, homosexuals, women, blacks, Mexicans, immigrants, poor people and (once) even children with autism. If anyone other than a white, heterosexual, Christian, middle or upper class, non-autistic male starts demanding their rights, Michael Savage is left spitting, shaking and sweating with rage, then vomiting up bizarre, twisted, hateful, conspiracy-paranoia ravings!

However, on this particular occasion he went even more insane than usual by explaining that homosexuals are to blame for Muslim terrorism. I have not seen this video posted on any anti-Michael Savage websites because he makes so many utterly crazy comments that even THIS apparently does not register. It was actually posted by someone who thought Michael Savage was making good points and obviously wanted to show how sane, well-adjusted and clear thinking Michael Savage is. (This is reflected in the video description and the top comments below.)
This person is obviously confused because not one syllable of his blithering, spitting, bat-shit-insane hate-filled, fuck-tarded pile of shit made the slightest bit of sense, and he clearly needs to be put in a  in a strait-jacket within a padded cell and kept away from sharp objects.
I will now demonstrate that by responding to the first two minutes of his mad ravings...

So you think that right-wingers are the problem in this world huh?

Yes, I do.

Well let me read you a little story. Headline, Daily Mail out of the UK. In the United Kingdom that used to be known as England, teachers have been forbidden from referring to pupil's parents as mom and dad, because it's sexist and assumes they're not being raised by homosexuals. Now you see a story like this and it makes your blood boil...

Makes your BLOOD BOIL? No it doesn't. You didn't even explain why they were doing this or what words will be used instead of 'mother and father.' If I didn't have any understanding of how political correctness works, I wouldn't understand what the issue is at all based on what you've said, so how can it be making you angry unless you're a hot-headed dumb-arse who reacts in self-righteous indignation before understanding the issue.

...to see just how far the gay mafia have gone in the soft nation known as England. They rule it. They rule the roost over there.

They rule the roost? Does that mean that you think the teachers will be assuming everyone's parents are gay until proven otherwise? Because I think it's more likely that they're using a neutral term instead of mother and father, such as 'parent or guardian,' because that is inclusive to all types of parental relationships, and we don't want to send the message that straight relationships are better than gay relationships. That's not ruling the roost, that's just wanting what everybody else has.
I know that you would like to send the message that straight relationships are superior because you think that people for gay rights are part of a propaganda machine trying to pervert children and rape their minds, but you're wrong and crazy so... Moving on.

Now as you well know, and this is very important to say not all Muslims are terrorists. I've said that a thousand times.

You also said once that America needed to nuke 100 million Muslims or die as a nation. It sounds like you send mixed messages.

But most Muslims are very traditional when it comes to family values. And that's a good thing for the west.

Unless it's a stupid tradition, like hating gay people.

Do you understand why the homosexual mafia is actually responsible for some of the Islamist behavior and reactions? Do you understand it?

Oh my god! That suggestion is so scary that it's shutting down my cognitive reasoning abilities!

Now you haven't heard this anywhere because the media is controlled as you know by the left wing.

We haven't heard it anywhere else because it's a crock of shit! Because you're the only one bat-shit-crazy enough to believe that homosexuals are causing terrorism. And America's media's is controlled 40% by Rupert Murdoch who owns Fox News you whiney right-wing, victim-complex douchebag!

But a lot of the Muslim rage across the landscape is being driven precisely by stories like this.

Are you sure it's not that we keep bombing their countries, or propping up dictatorships, or selling weapons to Israel to kill the Palestinians Michael? Nah, you're right. They probably just hate political correctness in British schools. That's probably their number one concern!

Where you send the child to a school, let's say in England. And the teacher's forbidden from referring to the pupil's parent as mom and dad because it's said to be sexist and it assumes they're not being raised by homosexuals. Now what would that do to you if you were a traditional Muslim family - not terrorist, but you didn't want your child exposed to that kind of filthy twisted mentality? What would it do to you? Tell me what it would do to your mind? Where would it drive you? Would it make you a more compassionate person towards the west? Or would it turn you perhaps into a jihadist?

WHY WOULD YOU EXPECT ME TO AGREE WITH  THAT?
No I wouldn't blow myself up just because teachers are using some word other than mother and father you fucking lunatic! What's wrong with you? You don't even know what words they're gonna use INSTEAD of mother and father and you're already ready to start strapping bombs to yourself? And even if you were right about this particular political correctness being bullshit, don't you have any sense of proportion? This is a small issue. Don't... blow... yourself... up!

DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT'S AT STAKE DAMN IT?! DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT I'M RIGHT AND THEY'RE WRONG? DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT THE SICK PERVERTS ARE KILLING ALL OF US?

Don't you understand that you need your racquet re-strung?
By the way, calling homosexuals 'sick perverts' makes it pretty obvious that you're gay. When you go that far, it reminds me of a five year old boy telling people that the girl he likes is 'yucky.' Because in both cases, the someone thinks that they can cover up what they really think by saying the exact opposite. But what the little boy doesn't realise is that it's actually very suspect that he would say that little girl is yucky, as that's not a normal thing to say. Just like it's suspect you say what you say about gay people.
If you don't want to come out of the closet, just shut up about gay people. If you call homosexuals 'sick perverts' who are in the gay mafia and accuse them of forcing terrorists blow us up, it's going to raise some eyebrows.

Bill Maher hates Christianity being compared to Islam

I found a YouTube clip from America of Bill Maher speaking to Brian Levin, the Director For the Centre of Hate and Extremism at California State University. Full clip here - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjwMWfWnd1k

In this clip Brian Levin responds to a query about the Boston bombers by saying 'People who are Muslim who do wacky things don't have a monopoly on it.' Bill Maher responds 'that's liberal bullshit right there.'
Maher then however qualifies that he thinks there are hypocrites in all faiths but they're not as dangerous, then goes on to cite death threats associated with the drawing the prophet and Muslims who want to kill people for leaving their faith.
Maher also states during the clip 'I'm not an Islamophobe. I am a truth lover. All religions are not alike.' and said to Levin 'ask most Muslim people in the world 'if you insult the prophet, do you have what's coming to you? It's more than just a fringe element.' Maher was also apparently not very open to hearing Levin try to put his comments into any sociological context. When Levin points out that Christianity was more violent historically, Maher dismissively responds by saying 'We're not in history, we're in 2013'.

Since Levin was clearly unprepared to have that conversation he didn't do a good job of explaining what was wrong, so I'll do it now. Here's the problem:
When Maher says 'I am a truth lover', he's wrong. What he's saying isn't the truth. It's a half-truth at best. A full truth would have mentioned the sociological context, or at least not tried to avoid mentioning it when someone else brings it up. When you mention that Muslims, (or any group of people) are more violent you have an obligation to say why this is the case, otherwise you are telling a half-truth which seriously skewed from the full truth. This is especially important when there's already significant hatred and prejudice against the group of people you are skewing the truth about.
For example: imagine hypothetically that Levin casually remarks that no one particular demographic has a monopoly on violent crime. Is Bill Maher going to say 'That's liberal bullshit! Blacks are by far the worst! How dare you compare any other race to THEM! What? I'm just telling the truth! Blacks commit more crime! Is it racist to tell the truth to you libtards?'
No idiot! It's racist to tell HALF truths. There are significant sociological reasons why blacks commit more crimes and Muslims are generally more radical.
For one thing in relation to blacks, there's the history. America had slaves and when you inherit poverty you've got a greater chance of being poor yourself. More poverty = less opportunity = more incentives towards crime. There's also the war on drugs in America that locks up lots of lower class people just for using marijuana (which can't even kill you and is good for you in a lot of ways). Lots of blacks are lower class = less opportunity to get your life together if you've been locked up = more incentive to crime again. There's also the fact the our education systems have subtle cultural bias because white people are the majority in America and it's naturally easier for teachers to teach students who are more similar to them culturally. Bottom line - 'There's more crime among blacks because blacks had less opportunity to reach their full potentials.' That is telling the WHOLE truth.
Given that America and Israel have been bombing Muslim countries to shit for the last 70 years basically and America propped up and supported dictators across the middle east, I'd say it's a sociological problem among Muslims too. Of course they're going to be more radical if they're country's been destroyed by war and oppression.
In summary, you can't just put all of the emphasis on the individual. You HAVE to mention circumstances. If you don't you're not a truth-lover you are a truth-perverter. Here's another example - If I beat someone in a 100m sprint but I only win because my opponent had a 30kg ball and chain tied around his right ankle, don't I have an obligation to mention the 30kg ball and chain when I go around bragging that I beat him? I can't just say 'Ha! Ha! Ha! My opponent was a bleeding-heart liberal Communist who can't stand the fact that I beat him because he sucks and I rule! Why doesn't he just pull himself up by the bootstraps, instead of whining all the time?'
That's all Bill Maher's doing when he talks about Muslims. 'Muslim's are bad. Uur-merica good. We're better than them. I'm just telling the truth'. -Fuck you.